Murugan cleans my car in the mornings,
and also that of many others in my apartments. I see him only on Saturdays,
when he collects the key for cleaning the inside of my car. When the big floods
came early this December, Murugan did not report to work for many days. That
was not unusual, because many in Chennai could not travel to work during those
deluged days.
He appeared more than a week later. Like
everybody else in Chennai, he also had a story to tell. On Wednesday, 2
December morning at 3 a.m. his cot felt wet. He woke up to rising waters in his
room. He came out without having time to collect any of his belongings. He sent
his wife and four-year old child to her village by bus, and stayed in a rescue
centre for the remaining days of the week.
When he recalled how the water from the
Chembarambakkam reservoir flowing through the Adayar river took away his
belongings, he repeated about losing his supply of rice, dal and salt, underlining how the water swept away even the most
basic of his needs.
 |
| The New Year eve is muted in Chennai because of the floods |
The November-December Chennai flood was
in some way a great leveller. Usually in cities it is the poor and marginal
that occupy the most marginal lands. And this usually happens in the banks of
neglected waterways. The banks of Adayar river, which flooded with rain water
and also the water from Chembarambakam reservoir is both a priced real estate
and marginal land at the same time.
If Murugan rented a room near Adayar
river because of lower rents, the floodplains of the river also houses the
richest and most powerful in the city. The picture that went viral on social
media was of a leading industrialist being rescued from his Kotturpuram estate
in a boat. Also, among those affected badly were senior government officials
living in Manapakkam.
At least this made the disaster an
inclusive one. Needless to say there was certain subaltern glee in the comments
that followed the social media pictures of elderly industrialist and his wife
in a fishing boat, or of the private jets that dashed against structures in the
flooded airport. But more important, there was the consolation that the floods
did not spare anybody, rich or poor.
This is of great importance at a
practical level. Everybody in Chennai had felt the pain in some way or the
other, and in that sense has a responsibility to ensure that this does not
happen again.
The theme that keeps returning in all
conversations in post-flood Chennai is fact that the Adayar river rose almost
without any warning. It was not as if a cloudburst or a dam breach that caused the
deluge in the river, but heavy rains from a low pressure condition which the
residents of the city were aware of days in advance. And it was also not as if
this was an isolated event. There had been copious rains from the first week of
November, with very heavy showers in middle and later part of the month, and
the reservoirs were getting filled to the brim. If excess water was released
through the river in the interim period between the two events then the deluge
and the cost to life and property could have been avoided.
Nature contributed the rains, but human
decisions caused the deluge. There were three weather events back-to-back in
November-December. They were not caused by climate change, and were caused by a
combination of the El Nino effect and an Indian Ocean-specific movement of
warmer currents towards the eastern coast of Tamil Nadu. This kind of event has
happened before, and will happen again in future.
The linkage to climate change comes with
the prognosis that there can be more such events in the future. The Fifth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says that
there could be more extreme weather events in the future. The Tamil Nadu State
Action Plan on Climate Change, on the other hand, predicts that though the
number of cyclones may not increase they would increase in their intensity.
For those who went through the Chennai
floods the linkage with climate change does not matter. For them the reality
was that the water rose quickly, without warning, and in it they lost all their
earnings and belongings. Some lost their family members to the rising waters. The
insult to injury was when the administration opened the sluice gates of the
reservoirs upstream of the city without adequate warning.
Weeks after the floods, the city is
getting back to business as usual. A rather unusual advertisement was on the
front page of newspapers a couple of days ago. A builder was making a mountain
out of the molehill fact that his proposed apartments stood on ground that did
not flood during the rains. We know how to make money out of every situation.
The city newspapers carry reports on the
ongoing music festival. Even while we lose ourselves in the soulfully divine
music of the Margazhi season, let us
remember of the tens of thousands like Murugan for whom life changed that
morning in early December. Move on we must, for that is what life is about, but
let us at least ensure that we don’t walk into the same situation again.
Margazhi,
Pongal and Deepavali, there will be enough reasons
for us to celebrate. But let us not forget the lessons that this year’s rains
taught us. If we do not put systems in place to ensure that what happened does
not happen again, then we haven’t learnt from our lessons.
Let us not mistake our ability to cope
with the floods as our resilience. That will be a costly mistake. We coped
because we had to. Our lives, our livelihood is somehow linked to this city,
and hence we coped. But building resilience is not about us as an individual or
a community. It is about systems, protocols, delegation of authority and
accountability. It is about being prepared, for the waters may rise again –
when we have just about forgotten 2015.
Acceptance is the first step. Let us
accept that we live in a flat, flood-prone city. Let us accept that we have not
thought through our cleanliness and hygiene. Let us accept that we forget about
our wastes as soon as we dump it in the bins, or around it, not realising that
this itself comes back to cause diseases after the rains stop. Let us accept
that we have messed up our tanks, lakes and marshlands, which could have otherwise
served us as water balancing structures during heavy rains.
Let us also accept that we did not have a
system to deal with the situation such as what happened a few weeks ago. And we
never demanded that such a situation be put in place. Worse, if even after
having lived through the floods we continue to avoid demanding for it, then let
us accept that we are not willing to learn our lessons.
It will be a sufficient achievement if 2015 made us acknowledge and accept these inadequacies. When we hang new calendars on our flood-stained walls tomorrow, we can start with the process of ensuring that this does not happen again. Rains came in the past, and will come in the future. But at least we should avoid the impact of man-made consequences.
It will be a sufficient achievement if 2015 made us acknowledge and accept these inadequacies. When we hang new calendars on our flood-stained walls tomorrow, we can start with the process of ensuring that this does not happen again. Rains came in the past, and will come in the future. But at least we should avoid the impact of man-made consequences.
