“I have had
for many years the greatest admiration for Jawaharlal Nehru, not only on
account of the great work that he, in company with other Indian leaders, was
doing for his country, but also, and probably more so, because I respected him
as a man of purpose, of courage and determination, and one genuinely dedicated
to the cause of India.”
- Kwame Nkrumah, first President of Ghana, in 1960
Driving through the avenues of downtown Accra,
the capital city of Ghana, especially in the where the governmental buildings
and monuments are located, I was struck by its resemblance to Lutyens Delhi.
The Independence Square building in Accra had a striking resemblance to our
India Gate. Tata buses jostled for space at the bus station, reminding me of similar
facilities back in India.
I visited Accra multiple times during my
30-month assignment at an international agricultural research centre in Cotonou
in Benin. Travelling from the francophone Benin, through Togo, to the
Anglophone Ghana always was a welcome break for us. In both India and Ghana the
colonial master – Britain – had laid down a common layer of administration and
governance over the countries’ histories.
The road to Africa was laid a long time ago |
“As a fighter
for colonial freedom, I followed avidly the progress of the revolution which
was taking place in India prior to her independence. When the time came for me
to do something about gaining the political independence of my own country, it
was a natural thing that I should take inspiration from India and her leaders
who has so recently had to face and overcome problems facing my own countrymen.
There was no doubt whatever in my mind that Gandhi’s policy of non-violence was
the only effective means of dealing with the colonial problem.”
It is not surprising that 55 years later, the present
President of Ghana, John Dramani Mahama, along with many other African leaders
praised Nehru for the initiative of building and strengthening Indo-African
relations, much to the chagrin of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who had
carefully avoided references to Nehru or his daughter.
The present context of the India-Africa
Summit was more to do with economy rather than politics or history. In fact
with the foreign-policy-begins-here-and-now outlook of the present Indian
Government, history was not something that it wanted reflected at the meeting.
Unfortunately, no nation is a historical island, and references to Jawaharlal
Nehru would have been a natural reflex for many African leaders.
A whole group of African nations got
their Independence in and around 1960, slightly more than a dozen years after
India got hers. So for many of the leaders who led their countries through
their independence struggle, India was the model of a new nation. It is India
that they looked to for the way in which a constitution could be designed and a
people’s democracy set in place. Even though many of the African countries did
not develop an as effective constitution, or a robust democracy as in India,
the image remained in their collective psyche. Jawaharlal Nehru was seen as the
leader-statesman who led India through this process.
I was in Cotonou from August 2009 to
December 2011, and even then China and India were both investing in projects in
African countries. The difference between the two investments was that while China
revelled in more in your face kind of engagement, India had a subtler approach.
Thus, the neatly tarred highway entering
the city of Cotonou in Benin, a principal highway in Mali, or similar projects
were funded by the Chinese with quid pro quos in terms of land for farming and
other business deals. Indian deals were more to do with private agriculture and
telecommunications. Airtel was entering the mobile phone market in a big way in
those years.
That was a period of India’s heightened
business interest in Africa. Even while the US and Europe was going through economic
distress, China and India’s economies were growing. India’s confidence in its economy
was growing and the rupee had a new international symbol.
That was also the period when the
India-Africa Forum Summits started. The first one was held in New Delhi in
2008, and the second in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in 2011. Africa was seen as the business destination where the next growth story would happen.
Today, while the third Summit was held in
New Delhi last week, the prognosis about Africa remains the same, though India’s
economic position has weakened. However, with China doing worse, the Summit was
seen as an opportunity for India to enter the space vacated by the Chinese in
Africa. Also, the meeting was an opportunity for India to garner support from
African countries for its bid for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council.
A continent with 54 countries, Africa has
a landmass that is eight times as large as India. In this vast expanse live one
billion people. Its economic growth story is continuing at 4.5% to 5% of the
GDP, according to the African Economic Outlook for 2015 published by the
African Development Bank and other international partners. In 2013, the growth
rate fell from the above 6% figure of 2012. Interestingly, the West African
countries grew by 6% in 2014, despite the Ebola outbreak.
Africa’s population, however, is likely to
grow in the coming decades. In 2014, nine out of 10 top countries with the
highest fertility rate were from Africa. On an average, a woman in Niger had
6.89 children, and this was the world’s highest fertility rate.
For the national leaderships in Africa,
their relations with India started even before their nation states gained
independence from their colonial masters. Their business relations, on the
other hand, started in the early days of their existence as independent
countries.
History is not a buffet where we can pick and choose. Whether a dish is good or bad is a matter of personal understanding, but the buffet is in open view of all. Thus for African leaders, Jawaharlal Nehru is the earliest and an important leader of India with whom they relate. And they will remember him regardless of what the Indian Government of the day wants.
History is not a buffet where we can pick and choose. Whether a dish is good or bad is a matter of personal understanding, but the buffet is in open view of all. Thus for African leaders, Jawaharlal Nehru is the earliest and an important leader of India with whom they relate. And they will remember him regardless of what the Indian Government of the day wants.
The basic mistake we do is to treat Africa as one homogeneous entity which it is not, by any stretch of imagination. Evidence is trying to promote UN reforms in the parleys, without realizing that South Africa's bid (together with that of India's) is a bone of contention among other African nations such as Nigeria.
ReplyDeleteThats probably true for many a post colonial nation from both Africa and Asia. That Nehruvian legacy cannot easily be wished away....at least not for those who fought a common colonial hegemony
ReplyDelete